Discussion Board (Corporates)
 Board
Write new posting
Read old postings (archive)
Read your postings
Last 50 Postings | Last 100 Postings
02-21-26 victor
pana, so your father-in-law is NOT in the black list?
did you have anything to do with it?
:-)) |
|
02-21-26 carib
La administración de Estados Unidos ha puesto sobre la mesa una exigencia directa a Delcy Rodríguez: la colaboración inmediata para la entrega o procesamiento de una "lista negra" de nueve personas de alto interés, encabezada por "Nicolasito" Maduro Guerra, hijo del depuesto mandatario.
Según informes obtenidos por el periodista David Alandate, de ABC, la petición no es un simple formalismo diplomático, sino un ultimátum operativo que condiciona la normalización de relaciones, el levantamiento de sanciones y la agenda energética entre ambos países.
Además de Nicolasito, intentan extraditar a Alex Saab, Raúl Gorrín, Walter Jacob Gavidia Flores, Tareck El Aissami, Samark López Bello y Pedro Martín Olivares. |
|
02-21-26 spal
Iran logic is simply that it is disruption that is good for clean tanker rates. If the Straight of Hormuz is blocked then rates spike more. This means alternative routing of supply (longer routes ... longer shipping miles ... equals less ships ... rates go up). Also clamps on Iran mean more clamps on ghost fleet ... thus more demand and higher rates for the legitimate fleet.
It will all be "transitory", but this is a "call" made in the midst of a squeeze up. Some schtocks are very hight beta on this ... FRO for example. They squeeze up ... you hold ... sell when you feel it is right and move on. Just a biz. |
|
02-21-26 panasonic
Spal, on freight rates of VLCC the word "transitory" applies, not the same kind of transitory as Powell's ;-)
Not sure I follow the logic on Iran as "good" for oil prices, but it became hard to read, I take it day by day. |
|
02-21-26 panasonic
Spal, yes me not involved (sadly) but WBD stock was 8$ before that bid fight started between Nflx an Paramount.
Last offer 31$, so media assets (all the sudden) have more value vs what market was pricing.
Different situation but same mis-pricing Madison Square Garden. |
|
02-21-26 Merlino
FOR US OIL COMPANIES: “WAR IN IRAN WILL BE A WONDERFUL OPPORTUNITY”
Max Blumenthal reveals this on Grayzone, reporting that at the American Petroleum Institute summit, attended by executives and consultants from companies in the sector, one of the most experienced among them, Bob McNally, explained: "Iran is the biggest promise, although it represents the greatest risk, it is also the greatest opportunity. If you can imagine the United States opening an embassy in Tehran, the Tehran regime in tune with its people—the most pro-American population in the Middle East outside of Israel, historically skilled both culturally and commercially. If you can imagine our industry returning there, we would get much more oil and much sooner than we would get from Venezuela." |
|
02-21-26 spal
$200,000/day if interdictions ramp up
===
I certainly like the thought of this number ... even in the heightened environment we are in ... if this is a possibility all tanker stocks (ECO, TNK, FRO, DHT etc.) at least double. |
|
02-21-26 spal
By invalidating tariffs, it may force a heavier reliance on sanctions, accelerating Dark Fleet disruptions (e.g., more designations/seizures), which analysts link to sustained or spiking rates (e.g., +60% in some segments post-major sanctions waves).
This could mean rates "spike even more" short-term (e.g., VLCCs pushing toward $200,000/day if interdictions ramp up), offsetting any oil price softness from Venezuelan supply re-entry.
The ruling reinforces a shift to "kinetic" enforcement (seizures over taxes), likely sustaining high tanker rates while straining global shipping
|
|
02-21-26 spal
Trump's presumptive power to tariff post the Supreme Court decision. Alternatives to IPEEA ... these sources can largely fill the void for tariffs as negotiating tools, as they provide delegated authority for unilateral presidential action without requiring case-by-case congressional approval.
They cover national security threats (Section 232), unfair practices (Section 301), and economic imbalances (Section 122), allowing flexibility in pressuring foreign governments—e.g., threatening higher rates unless concessions are made on trade deals, IP, or other issues. However, they are not unlimited: Section 232 and 301 require formal investigations and justifications, which can be challenged in court (though judicial deference is high), and Section 122's time limits could necessitate congressional involvement for longer-term measures.
The ruling may encourage Congress to reclaim more oversight, potentially through new legislation restricting these delegations or requiring approvals for major tariff hikes. In the short term, though, no cooperation is strictly needed, and the administration has signaled plans to pivot aggressively to these tools.
Impact on Controlling Other Countries' Use of Russian Oil and AlternativesThe ruling directly invalidates IEEPA-based tariffs aimed at countries purchasing Russian oil, such as the 25% duties on Indian imports imposed in 2025 (later rescinded but still subject to refund claims). Similar "secondary" tariff frameworks targeting buyers of Russian, Venezuelan, or Iranian oil are also unlawful under this interpretation.
This limits tariffs as a tool for pressuring third countries (e.g., India, Brazil) to reduce Russian oil imports, which fund Russia's war in Ukraine.
However, the decision is narrow—it does not curtail IEEPA's broader sanction powers, such as imposing asset freezes, transaction blocks, embargoes, or secondary sanctions on entities dealing with Russia.
Presidents can still use IEEPA to "destroy" trade ties via outright bans but not to impose revenue-raising tariffs.
[BTW this probably means even heavy pursuit of the Dark Fleet]
Alternatives include:Non-tariff IEEPA sanctions: Secondary sanctions on banks, companies, or ships facilitating Russian oil trades (e.g., via the Office of Foreign Assets Control, OFAC), as used in existing Russia/Ukraine executive orders.
Specific sanction laws: The Magnitsky Act for human rights abuses, or CAATSA (Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) for Russia-specific measures, which allow penalties without tariffs.
Other trade tools: If tied to unfair practices or national security, Sections 301 or 232 could indirectly target related imports, though not as directly as before.
Diplomatic/military leverage: The ruling may push toward non-economic options, like alliances or threats, to influence oil purchases.
Countries like India may feel slightly more emboldened, but robust non-tariff options remain to enforce compliance.
It reinforces congressional primacy on taxation while signaling courts' willingness to check "major questions" of delegated authority. However, it doesn't dismantle tariffs entirely, as alternatives allow continuation under more tailored statutes, and IEEPA remains potent for non-tariff economic coercion.
|
|
02-21-26 spal
|
02-21-26 spal
Spal, me looking for ideas of biz that won't get killed by AI.
===
Yes - interesting how fast the AI narrative shifted from what it can enable to what it might kill. Agree that we have to look out for this. |
|
02-20-26 panasonic
Spal, me looking for ideas of biz that won't get killed by AI.
Things are moving faster than most aggressive projections, i.e cybersecurity tdy sent to the hot seat.
What will people do with tons of free time ahead.
The fight for WBD exposed that value can be found in that sector. |
|
02-20-26 carib
PS: little new under the sun.
Apparently, the roman emperor Nero took control of the fire department, sent thugs to set fire to expensive homes, and offered to buy them cheap "on fire", sending the fire brigade as soon as the owner agreed to sell. |
|
02-20-26 carib
| Savo: obviously. abuse of power, which is a step towards absolute power, if successful, produces vast opportunities for corruption, as the case you mention proves. |
|
02-20-26 spal
Scale: Over $160-200B in IEEPA tariffs were collected since 2025, with $130B+ potentially refundable (estimates vary by source).
Cantor alone had capacity for hundreds of millions in claims and executed at least one ~$10M deal by mid-2025.
The overall market for these "special situations" trades ballooned in late 2025 as SCOTUS review loomed, with multiple firms involved.
Potential payouts could reach billions across all players if refunds flow quickly.
Key Players:Cantor Fitzgerald: Led by Brandon (CEO/Chairman) and Kyle Lutnick; marketed the deals aggressively.
Other Wall Street Firms: Unnamed hedge funds, brokers, and investors (e.g., via Orrick law firm facilitating deals).
26North and Oak Hill Advisors bought some of Lutnick's divested assets.
Sellers: Importers like Kids2 (sold $2M in claims at ~23 cents/dollar) and others hit by tariffs on goods like toys, apparel, and electronics.
Oversight: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden (D) investigated Cantor for conflicts in August 2025, requesting deal details and communications with the administration.
|
|
02-20-26 spal
Spal, yes nibbled, the guy understands media stocks
===
Ok ... will watch. Looks like a collection of legacy stuff. Audiences are declining, but maybe cash can be squeezed out as it declines. |
|
02-20-26 savo
carib.. still agreeing with Lord Acton?
https://x.com/dd_geopolitics/status/2024886862452851042
LUTNICK SWINDLES AMERICA AGAIN!!
The Supreme Court just ruled Trump's tariffs illegal. Guess who's about to make a fortune off it?
Cantor Fitzgerald, the firm now run by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's sons, has been buying up the rights to tariff refunds from U.S. importers at pennies on the dollar.
Here's how the scheme works:
→ U.S. companies paid billions in tariffs that are now ruled illegal
→ Cantor approaches those companies and says: "I'll give you 25 cents now for every dollar you're owed in refunds"
→ Companies take the quick cash rather than wait years for the legal process
→ When the refunds come through, Cantor collects the full dollar
Lutnick "divested" from Cantor by handing it to his twenty-something sons and placing his equity in a trust for those same sons. He paid zero capital gains tax on the transfer.
As Commerce Secretary, Lutnick has direct visibility into the government's legal strategy, how their lawyers rate their odds, and what arguments they'll make. His family's firm is betting against the very tariffs his boss created.
They bought at 25 cents on the dollar, and after today's SCOTUS ruling, those rights could be worth 80–90 cents.
The potential payout could be in the billions. This is insider trading with extra steps. |
|
02-20-26 panasonic
Spal, yes nibbled, the guy understands media stocks.
Followed him on MSGS and did very well. |
|
02-20-26 spal
| It is likely a dead duck ... |
|
02-20-26 spal
| Panas - thanks - did you buy it? |
|
02-20-26 panasonic
| Spal, Mario Gabelli likes media play VSNT after sharp sell-off. |
|
02-20-26 spal
ECO
OKEANIS ECO TANKERS
49.17 (+5.13%)
Super cycle ...
“But as long as the music is playing, you've got to get up and dance. We're still dancing,”
Chuck Prince |
|
02-20-26 pillz
|
02-20-26 panasonic
Spal, past days opinion was tech is done, no more upside.
My screens are telling a different story :-))
|
|
02-20-26 pillz
| US Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs |
|
02-20-26 spal
Druck - CRS
However, he fully exited the position in Q4 2025 (ending December 31, 2025), selling all 220,035 shares.
Certainly too early ... but a profit is a profit.
I increased my position.
|
|
02-20-26 spal
I will need to take a bit gain
===
Such is life
;)
|
|
02-20-26 pillz
| EWY up 4% above 140 , my strike price , I will need to take a bit gain |
|
02-20-26 spal
CRS
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
394.91 (+2.85%)
Apparently Druckenmiller likes the schtock ...
|
|
02-20-26 savo
The Supreme Court scrambled the US trade landscape Friday
meanwhile federal debt hit 38 trn... 2.5 trn more than when trump took over a year ago!
|
|
02-20-26 spal
They go higher IMO
Look simply at DHT latest renewals of the Taiga and Opal.
As of February 2026 the "dark fleet" is approximately 1,469 active vessels.
This represents roughly 20% of the global tanker fleet, a tripling in size since 2022.
The interdiction of this fleet will squeeze prices up. If you believe in the following:
1. Massive changes to directions of oil flow. Eg Vene, oil sand oil to China (replacing Ven oil that now goes to the gulf). Massive reversal by India on Russian oil.
2. Dark fleet pushed back to dry dock in Russia.
etc.
Spikes can be over shortly. This might persists longer (this is the speculation and the view is up to you).
I added today.
|
|
02-20-26 pillz
Time to buy tanker schtocks is now
/:
but they are 52 week high ?? |
|
02-20-26 spal
| Time to buy tanker schtocks is now ... IMVHO |
|
02-20-26 victor
| amy coney b was part of the maj.. 6-3 |
|
02-20-26 victor
The Supreme Court scrambled the US trade landscape Friday when it struck down the centerpiece of President Trump’s second-term tariff program, ruling 6-3 that his sweeping blanket tariffs are illegal.
The ruling came just over one year into Trump’s second term and after skeptical questioning from key justices during oral arguments last November and appears set to immediately halt a massive section of Trump’s tariffs. Those tariffs were first announced last year on “Liberation Day” using a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
“IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs,” read the decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts.
The ruling also raised the question of refunds, which could return an estimated $129 billion to importers in the months ahead. It upholds two lower courts — including the US Court of International Trade — that previously found Trump did not have the authority to impose global tariffs using the 1977 law.
The decision will likely have wide-ranging ramifications, affecting global trade, consumers, companies, inflation and the pocketbooks of every American. In recent weeks, Trump has already made plans to roll back some tariffs on metals, including on steel and aluminum goods, as he and his administration seek to battle an affordability crisis ahead of the midterm elections. |
|
02-20-26 spal
|
02-20-26 spal
|
02-20-26 spal
| Swinging heavily into tankers |
|
02-20-26 pillz
| 1.7 point below my strike price |
|
02-20-26 pillz
|
02-20-26 spal
The oil is obviously being transported already now, as we said in our prepared remarks, but I will let Christian comment on kind of our outlook for Venezuela.
Lee Edwards: Yeah. So last year, Venezuelan crude exports averaged about
Kenneth Hvid: 800,000 barrels a day. We obviously saw in
Christian Waldegrave: December and January after 500,000 barrels a day, and it was all the long-haul flow to China that disappeared. Just looking at where it is tracking in February, we are already back up to about 700,000 barrels a day of exports. So the oil is starting to move again. And it is all going on non-sanctioned ships primarily to the U.S. Gulf/Caribbean region, but we have also seen two or three cargoes to Europe. We know that India is starting to buy some barrels as well. So it looks like we are going to get back up to the normal run rate of 800,000 barrels a day of exports fairly soon.
Then I think there is an expectation as well that with the Venezuelan oil industry opening up and foreign companies coming in and doing more investment that production and exports could be boosted within the year by another 200,000 to 300,000 barrels a day. But that is obviously dependent on how quick they can get things moving there. So I think it is a good story for the tanker market in terms of the exports shifting from the dark fleet to the compliant fleet. And then if we can get some extra production and volumes moving as well, then it is just going to benefit the midsized tankers especially even more.
|
|
02-20-26 spal
Outlook and Strategic Assumptions
Global oil demand is projected to increase by 1.1 million barrels per day in 2026, with additional upside from Chinese strategic stockpiling estimated at 1 million barrels per day.
The shift of Venezuelan oil to the compliant fleet is expected to create significant demand, with management noting that every 500,000 barrels per day shifted to the U.S. Gulf requires approximately 20 Aframaxes. |
|
02-20-26 spal
Teekay Tankers Ltd. Q4 2025 Earnings Call Summary
Strategic Performance and Market Dynamics
Performance was driven by significant spot market exposure during a period where rates reached the second-highest fourth-quarter levels in 15 years.
Management attributes market strength to the unwinding of OPEC+ supply cuts and rising production from the Americas, which increased seaborne oil trade volumes to near-record highs.
Stricter sanctions on Russia, Iran, and Venezuela have created trading inefficiencies that benefit the compliant fleet by pushing volumes away from the 'dark fleet'.
Operational outperformance was supported by 99.8% fleet availability and a strategic reduction in free cash flow breakeven levels to approximately $11,300 per day. |
|
02-20-26 spal
Personal Income and Outlays, December 2025
Personal income increased $86.2 billion (0.3 percent at a monthly rate) in December, according to estimates released today by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Disposable personal income (DPI)—
personal income less personal current taxes—increased $75.7 billion (0.3 percent), and personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased $91.0 billion (0.4 percent). |
|
02-20-26 savo
victor...
«Ladran, Sancho, señal que cabalgamos» es una
frase popular utilizada para indicar que el progreso o el éxito de un proyecto genera críticas y envidias, lo cual confirma que se está avanzando. Aunque se atribuye erróneamente a Don Quijote de la Mancha de Miguel de Cervantes, su origen parece estar en el poema "Ladran" (1808) de Johann Wolfgang von Goethe o en la adaptación del personaje por Rubén Darío.
Puntos Clave:
Origen Falso: No aparece en ninguna de las dos partes de Don Quijote.
Origen Real: Se atribuye a una versión del poema "Kläffer" (1808) del escritor alemán Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, que dice: "Y el fuerte sonido de sus ladridos solo prueba que estamos cabalgando"
.
Popularización: Se cree que Rubén Darío popularizó la frase incorporando al personaje de Sancho en un contexto irónico. |
|
02-20-26 spal
Chris Shipping 🚢🚢
@christankerfund
·
12h
From the $ECO call, rates are continuing to move up and they feel like it’s “just the beginning of the current spike”. |
|
02-20-26 victor
savo, is this your translation of Cervantes "Ladran Sancho, señal que cabalgamos"?
//
it doesnt belong to him, cervantes didn't write it.
|
|
02-20-26 spal
| Summary for Feb 2026: If you are tracking rates, watch the Danish Straits and Caribbean blockade specifically. Every time a shadow tanker like the Veronica is seized, it removes ~2 million barrels of "rogue" capacity, forcing charterers back to the compliant market and pushing spot rates closer to the $150k ceiling. |
|
02-20-26 spal
The "dark fleet":
Russia is the primary driver --- the fleet is a tripartite alliance of necessity between Russia, Iran, and Venezuela.
The Russian "Core": Comprises roughly 65%–70% of the dark fleet. These vessels are largely managed out of the UAE, India, and Hong Kong. Many are former "Tier 1" ships sold by Greek owners in 2023–2024 to anonymous entities.
The "cessation" of dark fleet operations in Venezuela is not a hypothetical—it is currently unfolding. Following the U.S. maritime blockade and the subsequent "license-based" reopening of exports to Western firms (like Chevron), the dark fleet is being evicted from the Caribbean.
The Capacity Gap: Prior to December 2025, roughly 100–120 tankers (ranging from Aframaxes to VLCCs) serviced the Venezuelan "shadow" trade, primarily moving oil to China.
The Replacement Need: As this oil shifts to "compliant" trade (moving to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries), the route changes from a 45-day journey (to China) to a 4–6 day journey (to the U.S.).
The Paradox: While the shorter trip to the U.S. technically requires fewer ships, the retraction of those 120 shadow ships from the global pool is a net positive for rates. Those shadow ships cannot simply "join" the compliant fleet (like DHT or FRO) because they are blacklisted, uninsured, and structurally deficient. They are essentially scrapped by sanctions, effectively shrinking the global tanker supply by ~12%–15%.
Tanker rates are not linear; they are "hockey-stick" shaped.
When global fleet utilization is below 85%, rates stay near breakeven ($20k–$30k).
When utilization crosses 90%, rates explode.
Calculation: If the dark fleet accounts for 15% of global capacity and 50% of it is "retracted" (seized or idled), global utilization for the remaining "compliant" fleet jumps from 88% to 94%.
For every 1% decrease in available vessel supply (due to dark fleet retraction), spot rates historically increase by $5,000–$8,000 per day in a tight market.
As the dark fleet retracts, "Tier 1" charterers (Shell, Exxon, BP) become terrified of "sanction contagion."
They will pay a massive premium to ensure their cargo is on a DHT or Frontline vessel.
|
|
02-20-26 spal
DHT - just announced (after the close) that the Opal is chartered for 1 year at $94k per day. Across its fleet of 17 tankers DHT has a breakeven of $18k per day per ship. We are now approaching "super cycle" rates ... think that $110k is a good average for 2026 based on current conditions.
The super cycle narrative is often wheeled out ... what are the forces right now?
1. Ghost Fleet Clampdown: As Western governments tighten the "noose" on shadow tankers, the pool of "compliant" ships shrinks. This effectively removes ~15% of the global VLCC supply, forcing oil onto ships like DHT’s.
2. Orderbook Vacuum: There is a physical limit to how many ships can be built. Most yards are full through 2027 with LNG and container orders. Supply cannot catch up to demand for at least 24 months.
3. Ton-Mile Expansion: Geopolitical disruptions in the Red Sea have turned 20-day voyages into 40-day voyages around the Cape of Good Hope. This "stretches" the existing fleet, making every available ship twice as valuable.
As the U.S. and EU escalate enforcement and seizures of these vessels, the "compliant" fleet (like DHT’s) becomes the only option for major oil companies and reputable traders.
Safety Premium: High-tier charterers (Shell, TotalEnergies, Exxon) are increasingly unwilling to risk using "shadow" vessels. This creates a two-tier market where "clean" operators like DHT can command a significant premium.
I like DHT and FRO and will likely add both. Q3 targets of $25+ DHT and 50+ Frontline are possible.
Frontline is currently in the middle of a massive $2 billion fleet renewal. In January 2026, they sold 8 older ships and bought 9 state-of-the-art newbuilds.
The "John Fredriksen" Factor: FRO is known for aggressive financial maneuvering. They are currently more leveraged than DHT, meaning that when rates go from $80k to $110k, FRO’s stock price tends to "pop" much more violently.
The Diversification Edge: While DHT only does VLCCs, FRO has 39 smaller ships (Suezmax/Aframax). In the current geopolitical climate, these smaller ships are often more flexible for shifting trade routes (like the Mediterranean and Atlantic basins), providing a hedge if VLCC demand fluctuates.
DHT Holdings: The Case for Safety and Simplicity
DHT’s model is built on low-stress dominance.
The Floor: Because DHT’s breakeven is $18,300 (vs FRO’s $26,000), DHT is virtually "recession-proof." Even if the super-cycle ends and rates crash to $25k, DHT is still paying a dividend, while FRO would be barely breaking even on its VLCCs.
Payout Guarantee: DHT’s 100% payout policy is more rigid than Frontline’s. FRO occasionally withholds cash for acquisitions (like their recent $1.2B newbuild deal). If you want the cash in your pocket every quarter without fail, DHT is the superior vehicle. |
|
|
